Discussion:
Great Win
(too old to reply)
Adam Prince
2006-10-17 03:05:44 UTC
Permalink
That was a scary good game by the team tonight. Let's get a point or two in
Buffalo and finish it with a win on the Island.

That was a great game to watch. I don't think I have seen them just totally
dominate a game like that. Well yes Game 2 against Edmonton is the most
recent but you get the idea.

I have a feeling the team is just beginning a huge roll.
Garrett Dyer
2006-10-18 01:57:03 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 03:05:44 GMT, "Adam Prince"
Post by Adam Prince
That was a scary good game by the team tonight.
I was impressed as well. I liked how hard they were going at TB all
night, even with the 5 goal lead. And to do it without Wesley,
Hedican, Ladd, Letowski...anyone else? Even Hutchinson, my favorite
diss-on, looked very good. His passes were crisp and purposeful. Fun
to watch, it was.

And I love it when Tortorella loses...
f***@gmail.com
2006-10-18 15:32:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Garrett Dyer
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 03:05:44 GMT, "Adam Prince"
Post by Adam Prince
That was a scary good game by the team tonight.
I was impressed as well. I liked how hard they were going at TB all
night, even with the 5 goal lead. And to do it without Wesley,
Hedican, Ladd, Letowski...anyone else?
No! No! No! Garrett. Haven't you learned anything from Buffalo fans?
That was *NOT* the hurricanes playing against Tampa Bay since there
were key players out. The team is everyone, once a few players go out
with injuries, it's no longer the same team. And then it's all luck!
:)

Yes, indeed, it was a great win. Really hoping Friday goes well.
Definitely will be a tough game for the Canes.
Geoff
2006-10-21 04:15:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
That was a scary good game by the team tonight. Let's get a point or two
in Buffalo and finish it with a win on the Island.
That was a great game to watch. I don't think I have seen them just
totally dominate a game like that. Well yes Game 2 against Edmonton is
the most recent but you get the idea.
I have a feeling the team is just beginning a huge roll.
Ooops..sorry didn't mean to stop that steamroller. ;)

Sabs-Canes game tonight was great...much better than the first one...I've
had my doubts about the Canes doing as well this year but I think the
hangover is finally wearing off.

But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are unconscious
now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished well and then started
off the season with high hopes to go further...

The '74-'75 Sabs lost in the finals. The next season they started 11-1-1
(after winning there first 8 games straight). They finished well, but
unfortunately not as well as Philly, Boston, and Montreal. Montreal finished
with an insane record (58-11-11) and took the Cup.

The Sabres whimped out in the 2nd round.

Knock on wood...history will not repeat. Afinogenov has finally got it and
is going to a household name very soon from Milan to Minsk. If any of you
guys in Carolina care to see a fine goal reminiscent of Lafleur/Perreault,
watch Max's goal vs. Philly. This guy has so much talent it's fucking scary.
Adam Prince
2006-10-21 15:36:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Geoff
Post by Adam Prince
That was a scary good game by the team tonight. Let's get a point or two
in Buffalo and finish it with a win on the Island.
That was a great game to watch. I don't think I have seen them just
totally dominate a game like that. Well yes Game 2 against Edmonton is
the most recent but you get the idea.
I have a feeling the team is just beginning a huge roll.
Ooops..sorry didn't mean to stop that steamroller. ;)
Well one more win and their goes your prediction of four , by maybe, the
first of the year. :-p
Post by Geoff
Sabs-Canes game tonight was great...much better than the first one...I've
had my doubts about the Canes doing as well this year but I think the
hangover is finally wearing off.
It's been you didn't watch the Tampa game.
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished well and
then started off the season with high hopes to go further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the seventh
game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference Finals. :-p But
then again when a city hasn't won a championship since 1965, a 5-4 win in
the seventh game of the regular season is important. :-p
Post by Geoff
The '74-'75 Sabs lost in the finals. The next season they started 11-1-1
(after winning there first 8 games straight). They finished well, but
unfortunately not as well as Philly, Boston, and Montreal. Montreal
finished with an insane record (58-11-11) and took the Cup.
The Sabres whimped out in the 2nd round.
Knock on wood...history will not repeat. Afinogenov has finally got it and
is going to a household name very soon from Milan to Minsk. If any of you
guys in Carolina care to see a fine goal reminiscent of Lafleur/Perreault,
watch Max's goal vs. Philly. This guy has so much talent it's fucking scary.
But doesn't show up when the game counts, the playoffs this year will
determine if he has or not.

A fun game to watch and pretty much if both teams stay on their
trajectories, what the other two regular season match-ups should be like.
MBD
2006-10-21 16:55:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished well
and then started off the season with high hopes to go further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd say
that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little tougher
when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.

MBD
Adam Prince
2006-10-21 18:54:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished well
and then started off the season with high hopes to go further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd say
that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little tougher
when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman out.
So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.

So what's the difference?
MBD
2006-10-21 22:05:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished
well and then started off the season with high hopes to go
further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd
say that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice
advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little
tougher when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman
out. So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
Stay with me here. If the Sabres were able to beat the Hurricanes
*without* their top-4 defensemen, logic would suggest that if they *had*
their top-4 defensemen (hell, even if they had McKee, who suffered a
freak illness)...?

The series came down to the final period of game 7. Had the Hurricanes
beaten the Sabres in 5, or even 6, I'd be less-inclined to take this
tact. Is it that much to admit your team had some major luck in both
the Sabres and Oilers series?

MBD
Adam Prince
2006-10-21 22:25:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished
well and then started off the season with high hopes to go
further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd
say that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice
advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little
tougher when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman
out. So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
Stay with me here. If the Sabres were able to beat the Hurricanes
*without* their top-4 defensemen, logic would suggest that if they *had*
their top-4 defensemen (hell, even if they had McKee, who suffered a
freak illness)...?
The series came down to the final period of game 7. Had the Hurricanes
beaten the Sabres in 5, or even 6, I'd be less-inclined to take this
tact. Is it that much to admit your team had some major luck in both
the Sabres and Oilers series?
The Sabres could have won Game 5 in Overtime didn't they have a few good
scoring chances before Stillman got the game winner. In fact didn't the
Sabres have a 3-1 lead that Sunday evening which was Game 5 of the Wales
Conference Finals?

And in fact you did, http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/boxscore?gid=2006052807

And since Buffalo won Game 6 it would have been a 4-2 series win for
Buffalo.

You know the Buffalo Sabres were only a few missed opportunites away from
winning that series. The Carolina Hurricanes capatalized on those
opportunities and your team didn't.

Heck, even your beloved coach said the team lost the series in Game 5. He
prolly knows more about hockey than all of us combined.

I still don't see any difference between last night and Game 6 which the
Sabres won in Overtime.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-21 22:55:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished
well and then started off the season with high hopes to go
further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd
say that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice
advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little
tougher when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman
out. So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
Stay with me here. If the Sabres were able to beat the Hurricanes
*without* their top-4 defensemen, logic would suggest that if they *had*
their top-4 defensemen (hell, even if they had McKee, who suffered a
freak illness)...?
The series came down to the final period of game 7. Had the Hurricanes
beaten the Sabres in 5, or even 6, I'd be less-inclined to take this
tact. Is it that much to admit your team had some major luck in both
the Sabres and Oilers series?
The Sabres could have won Game 5 in Overtime didn't they have a few good
scoring chances before Stillman got the game winner. In fact didn't the
Sabres have a 3-1 lead that Sunday evening which was Game 5 of the Wales
Conference Finals?
And in fact you did, http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/boxscore?gid=2006052807
And since Buffalo won Game 6 it would have been a 4-2 series win for
Buffalo.
You know the Buffalo Sabres were only a few missed opportunites away from
winning that series. The Carolina Hurricanes capatalized on those
opportunities and your team didn't.
Heck, even your beloved coach said the team lost the series in Game 5. He
prolly knows more about hockey than all of us combined.
He also called Laviolette an idiot and said in the News a couple of weeks
ago that the Sabres would have won if healthy.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-21 23:12:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished
well and then started off the season with high hopes to go
further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd
say that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice
advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little
tougher when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman
out. So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
Stay with me here. If the Sabres were able to beat the Hurricanes
*without* their top-4 defensemen, logic would suggest that if they *had*
their top-4 defensemen (hell, even if they had McKee, who suffered a
freak illness)...?
The series came down to the final period of game 7. Had the Hurricanes
beaten the Sabres in 5, or even 6, I'd be less-inclined to take this
tact. Is it that much to admit your team had some major luck in both
the Sabres and Oilers series?
The Sabres could have won Game 5 in Overtime didn't they have a few good
scoring chances before Stillman got the game winner. In fact didn't the
Sabres have a 3-1 lead that Sunday evening which was Game 5 of the Wales
Conference Finals?
And in fact you did, http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/boxscore?gid=2006052807
And since Buffalo won Game 6 it would have been a 4-2 series win for
Buffalo.
You know the Buffalo Sabres were only a few missed opportunites away from
winning that series. The Carolina Hurricanes capatalized on those
opportunities and your team didn't.
Heck, even your beloved coach said the team lost the series in Game 5.
He prolly knows more about hockey than all of us combined.
He also called Laviolette an idiot and said in the News a couple of weeks
ago that the Sabres would have won if healthy.
Still he still said his team lost the series...and dlike all Sabres teams of
the past...had a 3-1 lead in Game 5...had a 2-1 lead in Game 7, jsut like a
2-1 lead in Game Six against Pittsburgh in 2001. The Sabres found a way to
lose.

Read it again, the Sabres found a way to lose.

FINAL SCORE

CAROLINA 4
BUFFALO 2

Carolina Wins Series 4-3

Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
MBD
2006-10-21 23:45:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that
finished well and then started off the season with high hopes
to go further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales
Conference Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a
championship since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the
regular season is important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah
I'd say that *any* win against a potential competitor for home
ice advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little
tougher when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4"
defenseman out. So how different is that. That was a one goal
game also.
So what's the difference?
Stay with me here. If the Sabres were able to beat the Hurricanes
*without* their top-4 defensemen, logic would suggest that if they
*had* their top-4 defensemen (hell, even if they had McKee, who
suffered a freak illness)...?
The series came down to the final period of game 7. Had the
Hurricanes beaten the Sabres in 5, or even 6, I'd be less-inclined
to take this tact. Is it that much to admit your team had some
major luck in both the Sabres and Oilers series?
The Sabres could have won Game 5 in Overtime didn't they have a few
good scoring chances before Stillman got the game winner. In fact
didn't the Sabres have a 3-1 lead that Sunday evening which was Game
5 of the Wales Conference Finals?
And in fact you did,
http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/boxscore?gid=2006052807
And since Buffalo won Game 6 it would have been a 4-2 series win for
Buffalo.
You know the Buffalo Sabres were only a few missed opportunites away
from winning that series. The Carolina Hurricanes capatalized on
those opportunities and your team didn't.
Heck, even your beloved coach said the team lost the series in Game
5. He prolly knows more about hockey than all of us combined.
He also called Laviolette an idiot and said in the News a couple of
weeks ago that the Sabres would have won if healthy.
Still he still said his team lost the series...and dlike all Sabres
teams of the past...had a 3-1 lead in Game 5...had a 2-1 lead in Game
7, jsut like a 2-1 lead in Game Six against Pittsburgh in 2001. The
Sabres found a way to lose.
Read it again, the Sabres found a way to lose.
FINAL SCORE
CAROLINA 4
BUFFALO 2
Carolina Wins Series 4-3
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.

MBD
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 02:19:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make excuse
febricated or not and move on.

Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game seven,
and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost the entire
regulation periods of game six.

After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining games.
They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime. The
opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't finish.

3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal that
could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.

Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
MBD
2006-10-22 02:54:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make
excuse febricated or not and move on.
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost
the entire regulation periods of game six.
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime.
The opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't
finish.
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
Heart is taking a team to a game 7 *despite* being down their top-4
defensemen and having AHL'ers taking their place. You think that the
Sabres having the lead in some games and losing it had *nothing* to do
with losing defensemen? You see, defensemen stop goals from being
scored. And it's not like the guys they lost were scrubs, or that the
guys who replaced them were superstars.

So save the "no heart" and "febricated excuses" lines. And be thankful
that your team got an amazing amount of luck to help them win the SC.

MBD
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 03:07:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make
excuse febricated or not and move on.
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost
the entire regulation periods of game six.
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime.
The opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't
finish.
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
Heart is taking a team to a game 7 *despite* being down their top-4
defensemen and having AHL'ers taking their place. You think that the
Sabres having the lead in some games and losing it had *nothing* to do
with losing defensemen? You see, defensemen stop goals from being
scored. And it's not like the guys they lost were scrubs, or that the
guys who replaced them were superstars.
That is very debatable. The folks that game in didn't make any glaring
mistakes that lead to goals. So obviously, they were decent enough.

There's an argument you could make about it....but I'll let you figure it
out.
Post by MBD
So save the "no heart" and "febricated excuses" lines.
Hey you are the one who is making the excuses not me. Your team lost in
seven games in the best series of the entire playoffs. What if's don't win
a championship.
Post by MBD
And be thankful
that your team got an amazing amount of luck to help them win the SC.
Thankful every day as a result of the hardwork, skill, heart, determination,
and luck (Game 2 New Jersey), that won the Stanley Cup for the Canes. Just
as you as a Sabre fan should not discount it in making yet more excuses for
the series that you will continue to do until the team wins a championship.
MBD
2006-10-22 03:18:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied
that more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And
the Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play
this season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the
entire playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and
make excuse febricated or not and move on.
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for
almost the entire regulation periods of game six.
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime.
The opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't
finish.
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late
goal that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
Heart is taking a team to a game 7 *despite* being down their top-4
defensemen and having AHL'ers taking their place. You think that the
Sabres having the lead in some games and losing it had *nothing* to
do with losing defensemen? You see, defensemen stop goals from being
scored. And it's not like the guys they lost were scrubs, or that
the guys who replaced them were superstars.
That is very debatable. The folks that game in didn't make any
glaring mistakes that lead to goals. So obviously, they were decent
enough.
There's an argument you could make about it....but I'll let you figure
it out.
Post by MBD
So save the "no heart" and "febricated excuses" lines.
Hey you are the one who is making the excuses not me. Your team lost
in seven games in the best series of the entire playoffs. What if's
don't win a championship.
Post by MBD
And be thankful
that your team got an amazing amount of luck to help them win the SC.
Thankful every day as a result of the hardwork, skill, heart,
determination, and luck (Game 2 New Jersey), that won the Stanley Cup
for the Canes. Just as you as a Sabre fan should not discount it in
making yet more excuses for the series that you will continue to do
until the team wins a championship.
It's not excuses since it's pretty obvious to most why the Canes won the
SC last year. And what's the excuse for the poor showing so far by the
Canes, most notably by losing to the horrible Islanders tonight? Lack
of heart? Lack of talent? Bad coaching? Bad luck?

MBD
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 03:36:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
It's not excuses since it's pretty obvious to most why the Canes won the
SC last year.
I have yet to see any publications say that the Canes 1) didn't deserve to
win 2) were lucky or 3) illegitimate

And what's the excuse for the poor showing so far by the
Post by MBD
Canes, most notably by losing to the horrible Islanders tonight? Lack
of heart? Lack of talent? Bad coaching? Bad luck?
No excuse they played flat.

What's the excuse for Game 6 & 7 in 2001?
MBD
2006-10-22 03:48:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
It's not excuses since it's pretty obvious to most why the Canes won
the SC last year.
I have yet to see any publications say that the Canes 1) didn't
deserve to win 2) were lucky or 3) illegitimate
No one said it was illegitimate. But yes it was lucky. Again facing a
team in a game 7 where they're missing 4 of their top defensemen, and then
facing a team who loses their hot goaltender in the first game, while being
taken to game 7's in both series, *is* luck. Regardless of what the
publications say.
Post by Adam Prince
And what's the excuse for the poor showing so far by the
Post by MBD
Canes, most notably by losing to the horrible Islanders tonight?
Lack of heart? Lack of talent? Bad coaching? Bad luck?
No excuse they played flat.
That's not an excuse? LOL.
Post by Adam Prince
What's the excuse for Game 6 & 7 in 2001?
I don't know. Maybe having a team with *half* the payroll?

MBD
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 04:04:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
It's not excuses since it's pretty obvious to most why the Canes won
the SC last year.
I have yet to see any publications say that the Canes 1) didn't
deserve to win 2) were lucky or 3) illegitimate
No one said it was illegitimate. But yes it was lucky. Again facing a
team in a game 7 where they're missing 4 of their top defensemen, and then
facing a team who loses their hot goaltender in the first game, while being
taken to game 7's in both series, *is* luck. Regardless of what the
publications say.
How is it, no one knows what would have happened if Roloson did not get
hurt. If he was going to stay so hot, how come he let in four goals in
about 20 minutes of Game 1 after being so 'hot'. See all these unknowns
keep growing.

I mean what if Ottawa would have not been boneheaded in Game 1 in your
series, what if they would hvae capatlized on their chances? Keep going on
the what ifs.
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
And what's the excuse for the poor showing so far by the
Post by MBD
Canes, most notably by losing to the horrible Islanders tonight?
Lack of heart? Lack of talent? Bad coaching? Bad luck?
No excuse they played flat.
That's not an excuse? LOL.
It isn't they played flat and not well at all for most of the game.
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
What's the excuse for Game 6 & 7 in 2001?
I don't know. Maybe having a team with *half* the payroll?
You were up 2-1 with 1:19 to go in Game 6. 1:19 and could have moved on to
meet the Devils. 1:19 left in Game 6 up three games to two, and after
totally outplaying them in Game 5 and Game 6.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-22 23:05:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
It's not excuses since it's pretty obvious to most why the Canes won
the SC last year.
I have yet to see any publications say that the Canes 1) didn't
deserve to win 2) were lucky or 3) illegitimate
No one said it was illegitimate. But yes it was lucky. Again facing a
team in a game 7 where they're missing 4 of their top defensemen, and then
facing a team who loses their hot goaltender in the first game, while being
taken to game 7's in both series, *is* luck. Regardless of what the
publications say.
How is it, no one knows what would have happened if Roloson did not get
hurt. If he was going to stay so hot, how come he let in four goals in
about 20 minutes of Game 1 after being so 'hot'. See all these unknowns
keep growing.
You forget what happened as soon as Roloson was replaced? These are unknowns
because you are inventing improbable outcomes.
Post by Adam Prince
I mean what if Ottawa would have not been boneheaded in Game 1 in your
series, what if they would hvae capatlized on their chances? Keep going
on the what ifs.
Then they lose in 6.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
And what's the excuse for the poor showing so far by the
Post by MBD
Canes, most notably by losing to the horrible Islanders tonight?
Lack of heart? Lack of talent? Bad coaching? Bad luck?
No excuse they played flat.
That's not an excuse? LOL.
It isn't they played flat and not well at all for most of the game.
Sounds like an excuse to me...
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
What's the excuse for Game 6 & 7 in 2001?
I don't know. Maybe having a team with *half* the payroll?
You were up 2-1 with 1:19 to go in Game 6. 1:19 and could have moved on
to meet the Devils. 1:19 left in Game 6 up three games to two, and after
totally outplaying them in Game 5 and Game 6.
Care to address his point, or were you surrendering?
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 23:55:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
What's the excuse for Game 6 & 7 in 2001?
I don't know. Maybe having a team with *half* the payroll?
You were up 2-1 with 1:19 to go in Game 6. 1:19 and could have moved on
to meet the Devils. 1:19 left in Game 6 up three games to two, and after
totally outplaying them in Game 5 and Game 6.
Care to address his point, or were you surrendering?
Again, if that mattered. Why did Buffalo have home ice in that series?
Obviously the payroll didn't matter in the regular season? So again what
was the reason the Sabres, after dominating Game 6 and had the lead with
1:19 to play, lost that series?

See just flat out say you lost and end it. I know for you , pla, that
stings. Hey it stings to see Volek's goal in 1993 still. You know you can
admit it. Just like the 1979 goal line stand by Alabama makes you cry
today. Or the Minnesota game that started Penn State's downfall.
MBD
2006-10-23 00:04:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Care to address his point, or were you surrendering?
Again, if that mattered. Why did Buffalo have home ice in that
series? Obviously the payroll didn't matter in the regular season? So
again what was the reason the Sabres, after dominating Game 6 and had
the lead with 1:19 to play, lost that series?
See just flat out say you lost and end it. I know for you , pla, that
stings. Hey it stings to see Volek's goal in 1993 still. You know
you can admit it. Just like the 1979 goal line stand by Alabama makes
you cry today. Or the Minnesota game that started Penn State's
downfall.
You're *really* as loppy as you sound, when you question what difference
playing with AHL players instead of some of the better defensemen in the
NHL would have made. Put it this way: you think the Hurricanes could have
won without Brind'Amour?

MBD
Adam Prince
2006-10-23 00:23:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Care to address his point, or were you surrendering?
Again, if that mattered. Why did Buffalo have home ice in that
series? Obviously the payroll didn't matter in the regular season? So
again what was the reason the Sabres, after dominating Game 6 and had
the lead with 1:19 to play, lost that series?
See just flat out say you lost and end it. I know for you , pla, that
stings. Hey it stings to see Volek's goal in 1993 still. You know
you can admit it. Just like the 1979 goal line stand by Alabama makes
you cry today. Or the Minnesota game that started Penn State's
downfall.
You're *really* as loppy as you sound, when you question what difference
playing with AHL players instead of some of the better defensemen in the
NHL would have made. Put it this way: you think the Hurricanes could have
won without Brind'Amour?
Again, you have yet to name what these players did to cost you the game.

Could the hurricanes won without Brind'Amour? Who knows didn't happen.

Just like no one knows in a seven game series what would have happened if
Buffalo were with healthy defensemen.

I'll give you what the argument should be. Because our team was without
four defensemen, the coach regulated the ice time to the players that were
NHL-caliber. Because of this at the end of Game Seven our defense was
tired, which possibly led to the go ahead and fourth goals.

Would Buffalo have won the series....no one knows...a lot of things could
have happened.

I don't consider it lucky that your team had injured players. If it was
reversed, and the Sabres had won because of injuries to the Canes. I would
have been; Hey, the Hurricanes had injured players but that doesn't make it
the reason they lost the series.

Your team had injuries, no one is disputing that, what no one knows is the
eventual outcome.

And to judge that in two very good and very close games in two games within
the first ten of the regular season is just illogical. Both teams are
different. Heck, using how yourself and others sound, I could make the
argument if the Canes kept Ward, Recchi, Cullen, Weight, they would have won
both games so far this season. But that's pointless. Just like nearly six
month later, continuing to say if only this, if only that...damn I'm a NC
State fan and we don't "if this" and "if that" as much as you all are.
MBD
2006-10-23 00:43:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Care to address his point, or were you surrendering?
Again, if that mattered. Why did Buffalo have home ice in that
series? Obviously the payroll didn't matter in the regular season?
So again what was the reason the Sabres, after dominating Game 6 and
had the lead with 1:19 to play, lost that series?
See just flat out say you lost and end it. I know for you , pla,
that stings. Hey it stings to see Volek's goal in 1993 still. You
know you can admit it. Just like the 1979 goal line stand by
Alabama makes you cry today. Or the Minnesota game that started
Penn State's downfall.
You're *really* as loppy as you sound, when you question what
difference playing with AHL players instead of some of the better
defensemen in the NHL would have made. Put it this way: you think
the Hurricanes could have won without Brind'Amour?
Again, you have yet to name what these players did to cost you the game.
Could the hurricanes won without Brind'Amour? Who knows didn't happen.
Just like no one knows in a seven game series what would have happened
if Buffalo were with healthy defensemen.
I'll give you what the argument should be. Because our team was
without four defensemen, the coach regulated the ice time to the
players that were NHL-caliber. Because of this at the end of Game
Seven our defense was tired, which possibly led to the go ahead and
fourth goals.
That's part of the argument, given that several of the lesser defensemen
ended up playing more than usual, tiring them out and providing lesser
quality play, along with the AHL call-ups who were inexperienced. As for
specific plays, pick any of the tying, go ahead, or 4th goals. Again the
job of the defense is to stop the opponent from scoring. The better the
defense, the better that has a chance of happening.

MBD
Adam Prince
2006-10-23 00:48:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
I'll give you what the argument should be. Because our team was
without four defensemen, the coach regulated the ice time to the
players that were NHL-caliber. Because of this at the end of Game
Seven our defense was tired, which possibly led to the go ahead and
fourth goals.
That's part of the argument, given that several of the lesser defensemen
ended up playing more than usual, tiring them out and providing lesser
quality play, along with the AHL call-ups who were inexperienced. As for
specific plays, pick any of the tying, go ahead, or 4th goals. Again the
job of the defense is to stop the opponent from scoring. The better the
defense, the better that has a chance of happening.
See if you give specifics like that, I can see what the injuries may have
caused. But by no way, does that mean the outcome of the series would have
changed. If it was one game, yes maybe. But so much can happen either way
in a seven game series.

To me though, arguing that two one goal games so far this season (which
could have gone either way) to prove that the ultimate outcome would have
been different is just absurd. Plus, it's just fun to get Glapski all fired
up.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 02:38:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Care to address his point, or were you surrendering?
Again, if that mattered. Why did Buffalo have home ice in that
series? Obviously the payroll didn't matter in the regular season? So
again what was the reason the Sabres, after dominating Game 6 and had
the lead with 1:19 to play, lost that series?
See just flat out say you lost and end it. I know for you , pla, that
stings. Hey it stings to see Volek's goal in 1993 still. You know
you can admit it. Just like the 1979 goal line stand by Alabama makes
you cry today. Or the Minnesota game that started Penn State's
downfall.
You're *really* as loppy as you sound, when you question what difference
playing with AHL players instead of some of the better defensemen in the
NHL would have made. Put it this way: you think the Hurricanes could have
won without Brind'Amour?
Again, you have yet to name what these players did to cost you the game.
Could the hurricanes won without Brind'Amour? Who knows didn't happen.
Just like no one knows in a seven game series what would have happened if
Buffalo were with healthy defensemen.
I'll give you what the argument should be. Because our team was without
four defensemen, the coach regulated the ice time to the players that were
NHL-caliber. Because of this at the end of Game Seven our defense was
tired, which possibly led to the go ahead and fourth goals.
Would Buffalo have won the series....no one knows...a lot of things could
have happened.
I don't consider it lucky that your team had injured players. If it was
reversed, and the Sabres had won because of injuries to the Canes. I
would have been; Hey, the Hurricanes had injured players but that doesn't
make it the reason they lost the series.
Your team had injuries, no one is disputing that, what no one knows is the
eventual outcome.
And to judge that in two very good and very close games in two games
within the first ten of the regular season is just illogical. Both teams
are different. Heck, using how yourself and others sound, I could make
the argument if the Canes kept Ward, Recchi, Cullen, Weight, they would
have won both games so far this season. But that's pointless. Just like
nearly six month later, continuing to say if only this, if only
that...damn I'm a NC State fan and we don't "if this" and "if that" as
much as you all are.
Interesting...you are making the case that the Canes are different team
because they are missing 4 players. Granted.

Now be consistent. You know we would have kicked your ass in 5 or 6 with our
defense intact.

You are a NC State fan? No wonder you are so jealous of Penn State:
Individual Game Results of Penn State (vs North Carolina State), 1869-2005
Date Opponent (record) Result Score Site
11/6/1982 vs. North Carolina State (6-5) W 54 0
11/7/1981 @ North Carolina State (4-7) W 22 15
11/8/1980 vs. North Carolina State (6-5) W 21 13
11/10/1979 @ North Carolina State (7-4) W 9 7
11/11/1978 vs. North Carolina State (9-3) W 19 10
11/5/1977 @ North Carolina State (8-4) W 21 17
11/6/1976 vs. North Carolina State (3-7-1) W 41 20
11/8/1975 vs. North Carolina State (7-4-1) L 14 15
11/9/1974 @ North Carolina State (9-2-1) L 7 12
11/10/1973 vs. North Carolina State (9-3) W 35 29
11/11/1972 vs. North Carolina State (8-3-1) W 37 22
11/13/1971 vs. North Carolina State (3-8) W 35 3
11/29/1969 @ North Carolina State (3-6-1) W 33 8
11/11/1967 vs. North Carolina State (9-2) W 13 8
11/17/1956 vs. North Carolina State (3-7) W 14 7
10/4/1924 vs. North Carolina State (2-6-2) W 51 6
10/6/1923 vs. North Carolina State (3-7) W 16 0
10/8/1921 vs. North Carolina State (3-3-3) W 35 0
10/16/1920 vs. North Carolina State (7-3) W 41 0


Or is NC state your basketball-only team only when coaches with V (ignoring
inconvenient things like NCAA violations, of course!) coach your team?
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-24 03:07:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
And to judge that in two very good and very close games in two games
within the first ten of the regular season is just illogical. Both teams
are different. Heck, using how yourself and others sound, I could make
the argument if the Canes kept Ward, Recchi, Cullen, Weight, they would
have won both games so far this season. But that's pointless. Just like
nearly six month later, continuing to say if only this, if only
that...damn I'm a NC State fan and we don't "if this" and "if that" as
much as you all are.
Interesting...you are making the case that the Canes are different team
because they are missing 4 players. Granted.
Now be consistent. You know we would have kicked your ass in 5 or 6 with
our defense intact.
Individual Game Results of Penn State (vs North Carolina State), 1869-2005
Date Opponent (record) Result Score Site
11/6/1982 vs. North Carolina State (6-5) W 54 0
11/8/1980 vs. North Carolina State (6-5) W 21 13
11/11/1978 vs. North Carolina State (9-3) W 19 10
11/6/1976 vs. North Carolina State (3-7-1) W 41 20
11/8/1975 vs. North Carolina State (7-4-1) L 14 15
11/10/1973 vs. North Carolina State (9-3) W 35 29
11/11/1972 vs. North Carolina State (8-3-1) W 37 22
11/13/1971 vs. North Carolina State (3-8) W 35 3
11/11/1967 vs. North Carolina State (9-2) W 13 8
11/17/1956 vs. North Carolina State (3-7) W 14 7
10/4/1924 vs. North Carolina State (2-6-2) W 51 6
10/6/1923 vs. North Carolina State (3-7) W 16 0
10/8/1921 vs. North Carolina State (3-3-3) W 35 0
10/16/1920 vs. North Carolina State (7-3) W 41 0
Or is NC state your basketball-only team only when coaches with V
(ignoring inconvenient things like NCAA violations, of course!) coach your
team?
Loading Image... :-p
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 04:29:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
And to judge that in two very good and very close games in two games
within the first ten of the regular season is just illogical. Both
teams are different. Heck, using how yourself and others sound, I could
make the argument if the Canes kept Ward, Recchi, Cullen, Weight, they
would have won both games so far this season. But that's pointless.
Just like nearly six month later, continuing to say if only this, if
only that...damn I'm a NC State fan and we don't "if this" and "if that"
as much as you all are.
Interesting...you are making the case that the Canes are different team
because they are missing 4 players. Granted.
Now be consistent. You know we would have kicked your ass in 5 or 6 with
our defense intact.
Individual Game Results of Penn State (vs North Carolina State), 1869-2005
Date Opponent (record) Result Score Site
11/6/1982 vs. North Carolina State (6-5) W 54 0
11/8/1980 vs. North Carolina State (6-5) W 21 13
11/11/1978 vs. North Carolina State (9-3) W 19 10
11/6/1976 vs. North Carolina State (3-7-1) W 41 20
11/8/1975 vs. North Carolina State (7-4-1) L 14 15
11/10/1973 vs. North Carolina State (9-3) W 35 29
11/11/1972 vs. North Carolina State (8-3-1) W 37 22
11/13/1971 vs. North Carolina State (3-8) W 35 3
11/11/1967 vs. North Carolina State (9-2) W 13 8
11/17/1956 vs. North Carolina State (3-7) W 14 7
10/4/1924 vs. North Carolina State (2-6-2) W 51 6
10/6/1923 vs. North Carolina State (3-7) W 16 0
10/8/1921 vs. North Carolina State (3-3-3) W 35 0
10/16/1920 vs. North Carolina State (7-3) W 41 0
Or is NC state your basketball-only team only when coaches with V
(ignoring inconvenient things like NCAA violations, of course!) coach
your team?
http://www.gribblenation.com/room.jpg :-p
Tell me you don't care as you respond with your 145th post in this thread.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 02:38:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
What's the excuse for Game 6 & 7 in 2001?
I don't know. Maybe having a team with *half* the payroll?
You were up 2-1 with 1:19 to go in Game 6. 1:19 and could have moved on
to meet the Devils. 1:19 left in Game 6 up three games to two, and
after totally outplaying them in Game 5 and Game 6.
Care to address his point, or were you surrendering?
Again, if that mattered. Why did Buffalo have home ice in that series?
Obviously the payroll didn't matter in the regular season? So again what
was the reason the Sabres, after dominating Game 6 and had the lead with
1:19 to play, lost that series?
See just flat out say you lost and end it. I know for you , pla, that
stings. Hey it stings to see Volek's goal in 1993 still. You know you
can admit it. Just like the 1979 goal line stand by Alabama makes you cry
today. Or the Minnesota game that started Penn State's downfall.
I'll take 21 wins in our past 25 games and being defending Big Ten
Champions. Then again, for Penn State, that is a downfall. Alabama beat us
fair and square. Two hail marys helped out Minnesota.

Why would Volek's goal hurt? Unlike you, I don't change my allegiances like
some two-bit whore. I am a Sabres fan. We didn't play the Isles in the
playoffs, idiot. I would have thought your Islanders allegiances would have
ended in 1982.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-24 03:09:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
What's the excuse for Game 6 & 7 in 2001?
I don't know. Maybe having a team with *half* the payroll?
You were up 2-1 with 1:19 to go in Game 6. 1:19 and could have moved
on to meet the Devils. 1:19 left in Game 6 up three games to two, and
after totally outplaying them in Game 5 and Game 6.
Care to address his point, or were you surrendering?
Again, if that mattered. Why did Buffalo have home ice in that series?
Obviously the payroll didn't matter in the regular season? So again what
was the reason the Sabres, after dominating Game 6 and had the lead with
1:19 to play, lost that series?
See just flat out say you lost and end it. I know for you , pla, that
stings. Hey it stings to see Volek's goal in 1993 still. You know you
can admit it. Just like the 1979 goal line stand by Alabama makes you
cry today. Or the Minnesota game that started Penn State's downfall.
I'll take 21 wins in our past 25 games and being defending Big Ten
Champions. Then again, for Penn State, that is a downfall. Alabama beat us
fair and square. Two hail marys helped out Minnesota.
Why would Volek's goal hurt? Unlike you, I don't change my allegiances
like some two-bit whore. I am a Sabres fan. We didn't play the Isles in
the playoffs, idiot. I would have thought your Islanders allegiances would
have ended in 1982.
Again with the name calling how rude, and unlike you. I really thought you
were a top notch poster and all. C'mon you can insult better than that!
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 04:28:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
What's the excuse for Game 6 & 7 in 2001?
I don't know. Maybe having a team with *half* the payroll?
You were up 2-1 with 1:19 to go in Game 6. 1:19 and could have moved
on to meet the Devils. 1:19 left in Game 6 up three games to two, and
after totally outplaying them in Game 5 and Game 6.
Care to address his point, or were you surrendering?
Again, if that mattered. Why did Buffalo have home ice in that series?
Obviously the payroll didn't matter in the regular season? So again
what was the reason the Sabres, after dominating Game 6 and had the lead
with 1:19 to play, lost that series?
See just flat out say you lost and end it. I know for you , pla, that
stings. Hey it stings to see Volek's goal in 1993 still. You know you
can admit it. Just like the 1979 goal line stand by Alabama makes you
cry today. Or the Minnesota game that started Penn State's downfall.
I'll take 21 wins in our past 25 games and being defending Big Ten
Champions. Then again, for Penn State, that is a downfall. Alabama beat
us fair and square. Two hail marys helped out Minnesota.
Why would Volek's goal hurt? Unlike you, I don't change my allegiances
like some two-bit whore. I am a Sabres fan. We didn't play the Isles in
the playoffs, idiot. I would have thought your Islanders allegiances
would have ended in 1982.
Again with the name calling how rude, and unlike you. I really thought
you were a top notch poster and all. C'mon you can insult better than
that!
You should realize that was being complimentary. Again, why would Volek's
goal hurt us?
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-22 23:02:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make
excuse febricated or not and move on.
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost
the entire regulation periods of game six.
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime.
The opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't
finish.
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
Heart is taking a team to a game 7 *despite* being down their top-4
defensemen and having AHL'ers taking their place. You think that the
Sabres having the lead in some games and losing it had *nothing* to do
with losing defensemen? You see, defensemen stop goals from being
scored. And it's not like the guys they lost were scrubs, or that the
guys who replaced them were superstars.
That is very debatable. The folks that game in didn't make any glaring
mistakes that lead to goals. So obviously, they were decent enough.
Care to rephrase this as an English sentence?
Post by Adam Prince
There's an argument you could make about it....but I'll let you figure it
out.
Only when you speak English first.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
So save the "no heart" and "febricated excuses" lines.
Hey you are the one who is making the excuses not me. Your team lost in
seven games in the best series of the entire playoffs. What if's don't
win a championship.
We aren't making excuses, simply stating the fact that we were the best team
in hockey last year.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
And be thankful
that your team got an amazing amount of luck to help them win the SC.
Thankful every day as a result of the hardwork, skill, heart,
determination, and luck (Game 2 New Jersey), that won the Stanley Cup for
the Canes. Just as you as a Sabre fan should not discount it in making
yet more excuses for the series that you will continue to do until the
team wins a championship.
You should really mention luck a few more times.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 23:51:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make
excuse febricated or not and move on.
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost
the entire regulation periods of game six.
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime.
The opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't
finish.
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
Heart is taking a team to a game 7 *despite* being down their top-4
defensemen and having AHL'ers taking their place. You think that the
Sabres having the lead in some games and losing it had *nothing* to do
with losing defensemen? You see, defensemen stop goals from being
scored. And it's not like the guys they lost were scrubs, or that the
guys who replaced them were superstars.
That is very debatable. The folks that game in didn't make any glaring
mistakes that lead to goals. So obviously, they were decent enough.
Care to rephrase this as an English sentence?
Post by Adam Prince
There's an argument you could make about it....but I'll let you figure it
out.
Only when you speak English first.
Again, name one mistake by the replacements or lack of ability that cost you
a game.
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
So save the "no heart" and "febricated excuses" lines.
Hey you are the one who is making the excuses not me. Your team lost in
seven games in the best series of the entire playoffs. What if's don't
win a championship.
We aren't making excuses, simply stating the fact that we were the best
team in hockey last year.
Detroit were. and you are part of the Sabres organization? When did you
get hired. Congrats! I know you weren't last year!
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
And be thankful
that your team got an amazing amount of luck to help them win the SC.
Thankful every day as a result of the hardwork, skill, heart,
determination, and luck (Game 2 New Jersey), that won the Stanley Cup for
the Canes. Just as you as a Sabre fan should not discount it in making
yet more excuses for the series that you will continue to do until the
team wins a championship.
You should really mention luck a few more times.
Yeah Kasparitis was pretty lucky in Game 7 in 2001. You know that hurts
you. 1:19 from moving on to the Finals with home ice advantage. 1:19.
Tell me, pla, did that sting worse or seeing your team blow a lead in game 5
and game 7 last year was even more?
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 02:26:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make
excuse febricated or not and move on.
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost
the entire regulation periods of game six.
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime.
The opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't
finish.
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
Heart is taking a team to a game 7 *despite* being down their top-4
defensemen and having AHL'ers taking their place. You think that the
Sabres having the lead in some games and losing it had *nothing* to do
with losing defensemen? You see, defensemen stop goals from being
scored. And it's not like the guys they lost were scrubs, or that the
guys who replaced them were superstars.
That is very debatable. The folks that game in didn't make any glaring
mistakes that lead to goals. So obviously, they were decent enough.
Care to rephrase this as an English sentence?
Post by Adam Prince
There's an argument you could make about it....but I'll let you figure
it out.
Only when you speak English first.
Again, name one mistake by the replacements or lack of ability that cost
you a game.
Don't say "again" you disingenuous cocksucker until you actually make the
request a few times in the same post.

Rory Fitzpatrick, game 7.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
So save the "no heart" and "febricated excuses" lines.
Hey you are the one who is making the excuses not me. Your team lost in
seven games in the best series of the entire playoffs. What if's don't
win a championship.
We aren't making excuses, simply stating the fact that we were the best
team in hockey last year.
Detroit were. and you are part of the Sabres organization? When did you
get hired. Congrats! I know you weren't last year!
Too bad you don't feel a part of your team - but that's the consequence of
changing teams every few months.

Why was Detroit the best team? Adjust for the weak schedule (they played in
a shit division, just like the Canes) and shootouts and the Sabres were
better.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
And be thankful
that your team got an amazing amount of luck to help them win the SC.
Thankful every day as a result of the hardwork, skill, heart,
determination, and luck (Game 2 New Jersey), that won the Stanley Cup
for the Canes. Just as you as a Sabre fan should not discount it in
making yet more excuses for the series that you will continue to do
until the team wins a championship.
You should really mention luck a few more times.
Yeah Kasparitis was pretty lucky in Game 7 in 2001. You know that hurts
you. 1:19 from moving on to the Finals with home ice advantage. 1:19.
Tell me, pla, did that sting worse or seeing your team blow a lead in game
5 and game 7 last year was even more?
The Rangers won the Cup last year?
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-24 03:12:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make
excuse febricated or not and move on.
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost
the entire regulation periods of game six.
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime.
The opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't
finish.
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
Heart is taking a team to a game 7 *despite* being down their top-4
defensemen and having AHL'ers taking their place. You think that the
Sabres having the lead in some games and losing it had *nothing* to do
with losing defensemen? You see, defensemen stop goals from being
scored. And it's not like the guys they lost were scrubs, or that the
guys who replaced them were superstars.
That is very debatable. The folks that game in didn't make any glaring
mistakes that lead to goals. So obviously, they were decent enough.
Care to rephrase this as an English sentence?
Post by Adam Prince
There's an argument you could make about it....but I'll let you figure
it out.
Only when you speak English first.
Again, name one mistake by the replacements or lack of ability that cost
you a game.
Don't say "again" you disingenuous cocksucker until you actually make the
request a few times in the same post.
Again. Again. Again. Again. And what's up with such harsh languge. I am
sure you can get the same point across without it. Again. :-p
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Rory Fitzpatrick, game 7.
And what did he do besides show up?
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
So save the "no heart" and "febricated excuses" lines.
Hey you are the one who is making the excuses not me. Your team lost
in seven games in the best series of the entire playoffs. What if's
don't win a championship.
We aren't making excuses, simply stating the fact that we were the best
team in hockey last year.
Detroit were. and you are part of the Sabres organization? When did you
get hired. Congrats! I know you weren't last year!
Too bad you don't feel a part of your team - but that's the consequence of
changing teams every few months.
Really? I've never changed teams..then again I am a season ticket holder.
So I guess I actually have reason to feel part of the team. Legitimite.
And judging from your use of derogatory terms, you have some issues you are
repressing. It's ok we understand. :-p
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Why was Detroit the best team? Adjust for the weak schedule (they played
in a shit division, just like the Canes) and shootouts and the Sabres were
better.
Well, what makes you qualified to be an expert?
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
And be thankful
that your team got an amazing amount of luck to help them win the SC.
Thankful every day as a result of the hardwork, skill, heart,
determination, and luck (Game 2 New Jersey), that won the Stanley Cup
for the Canes. Just as you as a Sabre fan should not discount it in
making yet more excuses for the series that you will continue to do
until the team wins a championship.
You should really mention luck a few more times.
Yeah Kasparitis was pretty lucky in Game 7 in 2001. You know that hurts
you. 1:19 from moving on to the Finals with home ice advantage. 1:19.
Tell me, pla, did that sting worse or seeing your team blow a lead in
game 5 and game 7 last year was even more?
The Rangers won the Cup last year?
2001...do you need the replay of the goal. You tucked your tail and ran so
fast from trolling the Pens group when the Sabres lost then, just like you
did last spring.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 04:27:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make
excuse febricated or not and move on.
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost
the entire regulation periods of game six.
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime.
The opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't
finish.
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
Heart is taking a team to a game 7 *despite* being down their top-4
defensemen and having AHL'ers taking their place. You think that the
Sabres having the lead in some games and losing it had *nothing* to do
with losing defensemen? You see, defensemen stop goals from being
scored. And it's not like the guys they lost were scrubs, or that the
guys who replaced them were superstars.
That is very debatable. The folks that game in didn't make any
glaring mistakes that lead to goals. So obviously, they were decent
enough.
Care to rephrase this as an English sentence?
Post by Adam Prince
There's an argument you could make about it....but I'll let you figure
it out.
Only when you speak English first.
Again, name one mistake by the replacements or lack of ability that cost
you a game.
Don't say "again" you disingenuous cocksucker until you actually make the
request a few times in the same post.
Again. Again. Again. Again. And what's up with such harsh languge. I am
sure you can get the same point across without it. Again. :-p
I made the point, but now you are ignoring it. And since you don't like
adult language, fuck.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Rory Fitzpatrick, game 7.
And what did he do besides show up?
He was responsible for a goal.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
So save the "no heart" and "febricated excuses" lines.
Hey you are the one who is making the excuses not me. Your team lost
in seven games in the best series of the entire playoffs. What if's
don't win a championship.
We aren't making excuses, simply stating the fact that we were the best
team in hockey last year.
Detroit were. and you are part of the Sabres organization? When did
you get hired. Congrats! I know you weren't last year!
Too bad you don't feel a part of your team - but that's the consequence
of changing teams every few months.
Really? I've never changed teams..then again I am a season ticket holder.
So I guess I actually have reason to feel part of the team. Legitimite.
And judging from your use of derogatory terms, you have some issues you
are repressing. It's ok we understand. :-p
Is legitimite some form of geologic formation or an Australian delicacy?

Which derogatory term did I use?
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Why was Detroit the best team? Adjust for the weak schedule (they played
in a shit division, just like the Canes) and shootouts and the Sabres
were better.
Well, what makes you qualified to be an expert?
That's hardly being an expert. It's called a brain...get one.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
And be thankful
that your team got an amazing amount of luck to help them win the SC.
Thankful every day as a result of the hardwork, skill, heart,
determination, and luck (Game 2 New Jersey), that won the Stanley Cup
for the Canes. Just as you as a Sabre fan should not discount it in
making yet more excuses for the series that you will continue to do
until the team wins a championship.
You should really mention luck a few more times.
Yeah Kasparitis was pretty lucky in Game 7 in 2001. You know that hurts
you. 1:19 from moving on to the Finals with home ice advantage. 1:19.
Tell me, pla, did that sting worse or seeing your team blow a lead in
game 5 and game 7 last year was even more?
The Rangers won the Cup last year?
2001...do you need the replay of the goal. You tucked your tail and ran
so fast from trolling the Pens group when the Sabres lost then, just like
you did last spring.
I was trolling the Pens group last spring? News to me...

I don't post during the offseason.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-22 23:00:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make excuse
febricated or not and move on.
True, many people have emulated their play this season. Many teams have lost
to Buffalo and are around .500.
Post by Adam Prince
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost the
entire regulation periods of game six.
Perhaps because we had 4 defensemen missing? They tend to be very important
in holding leads.
Post by Adam Prince
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime. The
opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't finish.
Who taught you to write? Or are you still dealing with that in the second
grade?
Post by Adam Prince
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
You mean the PP granted even though the Canes forechecker touched Campbell's
stick?
Post by Adam Prince
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
No, just had injured defensemen. You seem very sensitive to the fact that
Carolina wasn't the best team last year.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 23:48:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make excuse
febricated or not and move on.
True, many people have emulated their play this season. Many teams have
lost to Buffalo and are around .500.
Post by Adam Prince
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost the
entire regulation periods of game six.
Perhaps because we had 4 defensemen missing? They tend to be very
important in holding leads.
Again, name one play where the lack of defense or the lower quality of the
replacements cost you a game.
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime. The
opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't finish.
Who taught you to write? Or are you still dealing with that in the second
grade?
Still the opportunity was there. The Sabres like Affingenov didn't finish.
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
You mean the PP granted even though the Canes forechecker touched
Campbell's stick?
Post by Adam Prince
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
No, just had injured defensemen. You seem very sensitive to the fact that
Carolina wasn't the best team last year.
You're right, they weren't Detroit was. Since you love the stats, they
prove it.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 02:23:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
As they say, it's better to be lucky than good. No one embodied that
more than the Hurricanes last year. But luck runs out. And the
Hurricanes still get no respect.
Really, then why have a lot of teams begun to emulate their play this
season. Why can't you just say it was the best series of the entire
playoffs, which it was, not get hung up over how you lost and make
excuse febricated or not and move on.
True, many people have emulated their play this season. Many teams have
lost to Buffalo and are around .500.
Post by Adam Prince
Again, why did they blow a one goal lead in the third period of game
seven, and a two goal lead in game five. And had the lead for almost
the entire regulation periods of game six.
Perhaps because we had 4 defensemen missing? They tend to be very
important in holding leads.
Again, name one play where the lack of defense or the lower quality of the
replacements cost you a game.
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
After the series was tied 2-2, the Sabres had in all three remaining
games. They lost the lead in all three only to win one in Overtime. The
opportunity was their. And like Maxim Affingenov, they didn't finish.
Who taught you to write? Or are you still dealing with that in the second
grade?
Still the opportunity was there. The Sabres like Affingenov didn't finish.
Did Afinogenov get hurt?
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
3-1 in game 5 in the second period. Lost 4-3.
1-0 well into the third of Game 6. Won 2-1.
2-1 and 20 Minutes away from the series win in Game 7. On a late goal
that could have been a backbreaker. Lost 4-2.
You mean the PP granted even though the Canes forechecker touched
Campbell's stick?
Post by Adam Prince
Are you saying, your team also didn't have any heart as well?
No, just had injured defensemen. You seem very sensitive to the fact that
Carolina wasn't the best team last year.
You're right, they weren't Detroit was. Since you love the stats, they
prove it.
Detroit played in a piss poor division, something you'd be familiar with.

Adjust for schedule and shootout victories and say that was the best team.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-24 03:13:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Detroit played in a piss poor division, something you'd be familiar with.
Adjust for schedule and shootout victories and say that was the best team.
Well then you should understand. Carolina 4 wins Buffalo 3 wins very
easily. No ties or ny adjustments to be made there right? :-p
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 04:23:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Detroit played in a piss poor division, something you'd be familiar with.
Adjust for schedule and shootout victories and say that was the best team.
Well then you should understand. Carolina 4 wins Buffalo 3 wins very
easily. No ties or ny adjustments to be made there right? :-p
By your own criteria, Buffalo was better.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-22 22:56:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished
well and then started off the season with high hopes to go
further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd
say that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice
advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little
tougher when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman
out. So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
Stay with me here. If the Sabres were able to beat the Hurricanes
*without* their top-4 defensemen, logic would suggest that if they *had*
their top-4 defensemen (hell, even if they had McKee, who suffered a
freak illness)...?
The series came down to the final period of game 7. Had the Hurricanes
beaten the Sabres in 5, or even 6, I'd be less-inclined to take this
tact. Is it that much to admit your team had some major luck in both
the Sabres and Oilers series?
The Sabres could have won Game 5 in Overtime didn't they have a few good
scoring chances before Stillman got the game winner. In fact didn't the
Sabres have a 3-1 lead that Sunday evening which was Game 5 of the Wales
Conference Finals?
And in fact you did, http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/boxscore?gid=2006052807
And since Buffalo won Game 6 it would have been a 4-2 series win for
Buffalo.
You know the Buffalo Sabres were only a few missed opportunites away
from winning that series. The Carolina Hurricanes capatalized on those
opportunities and your team didn't.
Heck, even your beloved coach said the team lost the series in Game 5.
He prolly knows more about hockey than all of us combined.
He also called Laviolette an idiot and said in the News a couple of weeks
ago that the Sabres would have won if healthy.
Still he still said his team lost the series...and dlike all Sabres teams
of the past...had a 3-1 lead in Game 5...had a 2-1 lead in Game 7, jsut
like a 2-1 lead in Game Six against Pittsburgh in 2001. The Sabres found
a way to lose.
Yeah, we did lose the series. I don't think anyone is disputing that. But
everyone (as indicating by the Bruins broadcasters last night) is in
agreement that Buffalo would have beaten Carolina with a few of our
defensemen back.
Post by Adam Prince
Read it again, the Sabres found a way to lose.
FINAL SCORE
CAROLINA 4
BUFFALO 2
Carolina Wins Series 4-3
Deal with it. I know you can't but just try...
I've dealt with it. Try convincing me that it proves that Carolina was the
better team. Perhaps you'll repeat if 2/3 of your opponents' defense or
their starting goaltender gets hurt.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-21 22:55:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished well
and then started off the season with high hopes to go further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd say
that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little tougher
when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman out.
So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-21 23:09:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
Still lost though..a.nd you know starts are what matter. Four is greater
than three.

Just line 1999: In case you have forgotten:


& hell speaking of choking -



c'mon PLA 1:20 away from going to the Wales Conference Finals...and just
like last spring you ran with your tail between your legs. Pla, do you
never learn.

Come back when you actually have won something when it counts.
Adam Prince
2006-10-21 23:25:10 UTC
Permalink
excuse me it was 2001.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
Still lost though..a.nd you know starts are what matter. Four is greater
than three.
http://youtu.be/vuVy1sk3Kds
& hell speaking of choking -
http://youtu.be/OVCqHXAF0jA
c'mon PLA 1:20 away from going to the Wales Conference Finals...and just
like last spring you ran with your tail between your legs. Pla, do you
never learn.
Come back when you actually have won something when it counts.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-22 22:50:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
excuse me it was 2001.
We expect a lack of hockey knowledge coming from basketball country.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 23:41:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
excuse me it was 2001.
We expect a lack of hockey knowledge coming from basketball country.
Hey you learned something from last year. Raleigh is basketball and not
NASCAR. Now if you'd realize you lost four games to three.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 02:20:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
excuse me it was 2001.
We expect a lack of hockey knowledge coming from basketball country.
Hey you learned something from last year. Raleigh is basketball and not
NASCAR. Now if you'd realize you lost four games to three.
I know we lost. You haven't come to terms with the fact that we were still
the better team.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-24 03:15:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
excuse me it was 2001.
We expect a lack of hockey knowledge coming from basketball country.
Hey you learned something from last year. Raleigh is basketball and not
NASCAR. Now if you'd realize you lost four games to three.
I know we lost. You haven't come to terms with the fact that we were still
the better team.
Hey there's a start. Now the other part is debatable...but you don't know
how to debate without unnecessary language so. It kinds hurts the points
you are trying to make right.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 04:30:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
excuse me it was 2001.
We expect a lack of hockey knowledge coming from basketball country.
Hey you learned something from last year. Raleigh is basketball and not
NASCAR. Now if you'd realize you lost four games to three.
I know we lost. You haven't come to terms with the fact that we were
still the better team.
Hey there's a start. Now the other part is debatable...but you don't know
how to debate without unnecessary language so. It kinds hurts the points
you are trying to make right.
Not with those that matter.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-22 22:50:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
Still lost though..a.nd you know starts are what matter. Four is greater
than three.
With 2/3 of our defense injured, it really doesn't prove that Carolina was a
better team than us. They weren't. We've seen what Carolina's done against
Buffalo this year: 0 fer.
Post by Adam Prince
http://youtu.be/vuVy1sk3Kds
Wrong year. And which team are you supporting again? Are you a Minnesota
Wild fan now?
Post by Adam Prince
& hell speaking of choking -
http://youtu.be/OVCqHXAF0jA
c'mon PLA 1:20 away from going to the Wales Conference Finals...and just
like last spring you ran with your tail between your legs. Pla, do you
never learn.
So are you a Pens fan again or a Canes fan or a Wild fan? What will next
month's team be?

I don't post during the offseason. HTH.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 23:41:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
Still lost though..a.nd you know starts are what matter. Four is greater
than three.
With 2/3 of our defense injured, it really doesn't prove that Carolina was
a better team than us. They weren't. We've seen what Carolina's done
against Buffalo this year: 0 fer.
Will you get off the defense being injured. You keep holding on to that.
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
http://youtu.be/vuVy1sk3Kds
Wrong year. And which team are you supporting again? Are you a Minnesota
Wild fan now?
Post by Adam Prince
& hell speaking of choking -
http://youtu.be/OVCqHXAF0jA
c'mon PLA 1:20 away from going to the Wales Conference Finals...and just
like last spring you ran with your tail between your legs. Pla, do you
never learn.
So are you a Pens fan again or a Canes fan or a Wild fan? What will next
month's team be?
Hey I'd rather be a Pens and Canes fan vs.well being you.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 02:39:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
Still lost though..a.nd you know starts are what matter. Four is
greater than three.
With 2/3 of our defense injured, it really doesn't prove that Carolina
was a better team than us. They weren't. We've seen what Carolina's done
against Buffalo this year: 0 fer.
Will you get off the defense being injured. You keep holding on to that.
Perhaps because it is relevant...too bad you don't have an argument against
that.
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
http://youtu.be/vuVy1sk3Kds
Wrong year. And which team are you supporting again? Are you a Minnesota
Wild fan now?
Post by Adam Prince
& hell speaking of choking -
http://youtu.be/OVCqHXAF0jA
c'mon PLA 1:20 away from going to the Wales Conference Finals...and just
like last spring you ran with your tail between your legs. Pla, do you
never learn.
So are you a Pens fan again or a Canes fan or a Wild fan? What will next
month's team be?
Hey I'd rather be a Pens and Canes fan vs.well being you.
How long have you been a whore?
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-24 03:07:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Hey I'd rather be a Pens and Canes fan vs.well being you.
How long have you been a whore?
Well it only took four days for you to go into pointless name calling you're
improving from two!

Very good!
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 04:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Hey I'd rather be a Pens and Canes fan vs.well being you.
How long have you been a whore?
Well it only took four days for you to go into pointless name calling
you're improving from two!
I hope you realize the irony in your statement, but I doubt it.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-21 23:13:48 UTC
Permalink
and besides...how good is a team when the give up a goal with two men short?
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished well
and then started off the season with high hopes to go further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd say
that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little tougher
when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman out.
So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org
"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-22 22:51:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
and besides...how good is a team when the give up a goal with two men short?
That belief is popular with teams that have beaten us this year.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-21 23:18:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished well
and then started off the season with high hopes to go further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd say
that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little tougher
when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman out.
So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
So why did you lose Game Five after having a 3-1 lead then?
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-22 22:51:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished well
and then started off the season with high hopes to go further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah I'd say
that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little tougher
when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman
out. So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
So why did you lose Game Five after having a 3-1 lead then?
3 defensemen and Connolly hurt.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 23:43:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
So why did you lose Game Five after having a 3-1 lead then?
3 defensemen and Connolly hurt.
Still had the lead in all three games. 20 minutes away from winning the
Wales Conference and you blew it.

name me a play in that series you can blame the AHL call-ups on. Name me a
goal where they blew an assignment, out of position, etc.
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org
"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 02:21:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
So why did you lose Game Five after having a 3-1 lead then?
3 defensemen and Connolly hurt.
Still had the lead in all three games. 20 minutes away from winning the
Wales Conference and you blew it.
name me a play in that series you can blame the AHL call-ups on. Name me
a goal where they blew an assignment, out of position, etc.
Rory Fitzpatrick in game 7. Wow, was that easy.

The Sabres didn't blow one game all year when they had the lead after 2.
They blow two against the Whalers. I wonder why? Oh yeah, we were missing
2/3 of our defense.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Adam Prince
2006-10-24 03:14:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
So why did you lose Game Five after having a 3-1 lead then?
3 defensemen and Connolly hurt.
Still had the lead in all three games. 20 minutes away from winning the
Wales Conference and you blew it.
name me a play in that series you can blame the AHL call-ups on. Name me
a goal where they blew an assignment, out of position, etc.
Rory Fitzpatrick in game 7. Wow, was that easy.
What did he do? Show up?
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
The Sabres didn't blow one game all year when they had the lead after 2.
They blow two against the Whalers. I wonder why? Oh yeah, we were missing
2/3 of our defense.
Well hey, you lost to games to the Whalers and or Hurricanes when it
mattered most. Your problem not the Hurricanes and or Whalers.
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-24 04:23:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
So why did you lose Game Five after having a 3-1 lead then?
3 defensemen and Connolly hurt.
Still had the lead in all three games. 20 minutes away from winning the
Wales Conference and you blew it.
name me a play in that series you can blame the AHL call-ups on. Name
me a goal where they blew an assignment, out of position, etc.
Rory Fitzpatrick in game 7. Wow, was that easy.
What did he do? Show up?
Cost the Sabres a goal. There you go! Your criteria was met.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
MBD
2006-10-21 23:46:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
Post by Adam Prince
Post by MBD
Post by Adam Prince
Post by Geoff
But tell me...who the fuck is going to wake up Buff?...they are
unconscious now...kinda reminds me of another team that finished
well and then started off the season with high hopes to go
further...
Tell me, who is going to tell the Sabre fans last night that the
seventh game of the season isn't game seven of the Wales Conference
Finals. :-p But then again when a city hasn't won a championship
since 1965, a 5-4 win in the seventh game of the regular season is
important. :-p
Uh, considering that the regular season determines home ice, yeah
I'd say that *any* win against a potential competitor for home ice
advantage during
the regular season is important. And as you see, it's a little
tougher when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
The Canes lost Game 6 with the Sabres without "the top-4" defenseman
out. So how different is that. That was a one goal game also.
So what's the difference?
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
Don't confuse people from Carolina. They're a little slow on the
uptake.

MBD
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 02:20:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
Post by Jefferson N. Glapski
That just indicates how good we are. Oh, and we had McKee in game 6.
Don't confuse people from Carolina. They're a little slow on the
uptake.
Do what now? I reckon ya'll just don't think us folks are smart. Slow on
the uptake what do you mean by that?
Garrett Dyer
2006-10-22 02:23:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
Don't confuse people from Carolina. They're a little slow on the
uptake.
At least they eventually get it, which Buffalo folks never seem to.

Evidence? Look where Buffalo folks live...
Jefferson N. Glapski
2006-10-22 22:54:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Garrett Dyer
Post by MBD
Don't confuse people from Carolina. They're a little slow on the
uptake.
At least they eventually get it, which Buffalo folks never seem to.
Evidence? Look where Buffalo folks live...
Amherst? Williamsville? There are plenty of great places to live in Erie
County. And this comes from someone who's visited, but doesn't live there.
--
http://www.notredamesucks.org

"I have no clue. None at all."
-mianderson
Garrett Dyer
2006-10-21 19:32:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by MBD
And as you see, it's a little tougher
when your opponent is NOT without their top-4 defensemen.
Not *that* much tougher. That game was exactly like the past 10-15
between these teams, of which well over half saw the Sabres "top-4"
defensemen play. Besides, the Hurricanes were without 2 of their top
4, and it was another's first game back from a nagging injury. It's
most likely that Hedican won't play tonight because he's still too
gimpy to play back-to-backs.

So there you go...the exact game we've been accustomed to seeing
between the two, even though the Hurricanes were without some of their
best players. What does that prove? Nothing...just like we've been
trying to tell you every time you whine about last year.
Geoff
2006-10-22 16:53:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Prince
Well one more win and their goes your prediction of four , by maybe, the
first of the year. :-p
Haha...well actually two...one will get you that fourth win. And who knows,
you only have to play the Sabres two more times before Jan 1.
Adam Prince
2006-10-22 23:57:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Geoff
Post by Adam Prince
Well one more win and their goes your prediction of four , by maybe, the
first of the year. :-p
Haha...well actually two...one will get you that fourth win. And who
knows, you only have to play the Sabres two more times before Jan 1.
Oh didn't know you meant more than four wins. :-p
Loading...